online media- Washington Post

After reading the articles, and perusing though the Washingtonpost.com, I am going to have to say that I do agree with Grubisich's statement. Now, if I had not read his article I would most likely feel differently, for I do find it fairly engaging at first glance. Then you read about the poverty and struggles of the common citizens, and you wonder where the articles are that pertain to them. I understand that the inauguration is a historic event that deserves to be talked about, but you still need other local news as well. Not one main article in the Washingtonpost.com right now talks about lack of recreational resources for children, housing foreclosures, the rise in poverty, or anything along the lines of pertinent information for the public. If you want to engage the public, then give them something that they care about, and need to know about. A healthy mixure of both the inauguration and everyday news would of been nice to see. Therefore, yes I do agree with Grubisich, that there is room for growth when it comes to Weymouths visions, and the pillars of the Washingtonpost.com.